COVID-19, Nutrition, and Physical Health Outcomes
The GAIA study by Ipsos and the Virsa Foundation, which surveyed over 14,000 Americans, examined the experiences of the 2,375 participants who contracted COVID-19 between January 2020 and October 2021, capturing the interactions between their eating patterns and their physical symptoms. This approach provided a unique lens to assess the impact of dietary choices during the biggest health-based disruption of recent history.
The results of the GAIA study demonstrate a clear association between nutrition patterns and COVID-19 outcomes, particularly regarding symptom severity, the need for medical intervention, and illness duration.
The Standard American Diet and COVID-19
People who ate a Standard American Diet (SAD) reported more severe COVID-19 symptoms, with 44% experiencing severe fatigue compared to 31% of those on a Whole Food Plant-Based (WFPB) and 29% of vegans. Additionally, 37% of SAD consumers experienced severe shortness of breath, while only 10% of WFPB followers reported the same. Younger Americans (under 45) eating WFPB also reported fewer negative physical or emotional side effects from COVID-19 compared to their SAD counterparts.
In terms of medical intervention, 35% of SAD respondents required medical treatment for COVID-19. However, only 11% of those on WFPB or vegan regimens needed medical treatment. Those consuming SAD were also more likely to be hospitalized, with three times the hospitalization rate compared to those eating WFPB meals.
Whole Food Plant-Based Nutrition and COVID-19
People who consumed WFPB meals focused on eating plants and unprocessed whole foods were more likely to report experiencing mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 cases than both people who followed SAD, a pattern that remained true even across race, gender, age, and income. Vegans and those on a Standard American Diet tend to eat processed foods while people following a WFPB approach avoid processed foods.
The GAIA study found that people who ate WFPB or vegan meals reported the shortest duration of COVID-19 symptoms and were more likely to experience asymptomatic or mild cases.
This data emphasizes the potential of WFPB and vegan regimens in mitigating the severity and duration of COVID-19, suggesting WFPB nutrition can be a critical force in fighting the most adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infection and diseases.
There's evidence within the GAIA study suggesting that WFPB nutrition may serve as a preventive tool for future pandemics and in combating physical illness. Notably, 78% of respondents who had COVID-19 between January 2020 and September 2021 agreed that dietary choices could either increase or decrease the risk of getting sick. The pandemic brought about a widespread awareness of the connection between nutrition and health outcomes. People who reported eating WFPB or vegan meals were also less likely to report having underlying comorbidities.
The GAIA study also showed a link between the eating habits of people consuming WFPB and feeling healthier during the pandemic. Additionally, a majority of people agreed that they consume certain foods to strengthen or support their immune system. The GAIA study’s findings suggest that dietary choices play a significant role in bolstering overall resilience during public health crises.
Key findings from the GAIA study emphasize the relationship between nutrition and COVID-19 symptom severity and duration
Symptom Severity
People following a WFPB regimen experienced fewer severe symptoms and shorter illness duration.
Those who reported eating WFPB or Vegan meals were the most likely to report experiencing asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 cases.
44% of people following SAD reported severe fatigue, while only 31% of those following a WFPB approach and 29% of vegans reported the same.
37% of people on SAD experienced severe shortness of breath, compared to only 10% of those following a WFPB approach.
Younger Americans (under 45) on WFPB regimens reported fewer negative physical or emotional side effects from COVID-19 compared to their peers who followed SAD
Medical Intervention
35% of respondents who ate SAD reported needing medical treatment or intervention for COVID-19. In contrast, only 11% of those following a WFPB or vegan regimen required such interventions.
Hospitalization
Respondents consuming SAD were more likely to report severe COVID-19 symptoms or require hospitalization.
Those on SAD were three times more likely to be hospitalized than those on a WFPB regimen.